Animal Rights 11/18

2.
I think it's too lenient. In my opinion, those animal owners who treat their pets bad, like burnig animals or pouring chemistry to their body. I can't imagine that why people are so cruel to do so. If they love their pets, why should they do such terrible action? I think government should put these owners into the jail and whatever they want to argue. I mean it's no excuse. It's just the owners' faults. I'm glad that the amendment establish these bans to decrease the amount of violators. I also worry about these rules will be enforced in the future. I know the government wants to convince people how compassionate the government is. It's quite a confused action which they want to show. I hope this rule can be done some day. My suggestions are: if the violators are caught by their cruelty to animals, the authorities can assign these people to clean the animals'
3.
Its purpose is concerned about the welfare of animals in Taiwan. They try to raise awareness of the stray problem and education people about the responsibilities of pet ownership.
They rescue sick, injured, and young strays, rehabilitate them, vaccinate them, desex them, and try to find them permanent, caring homes.
In taiwan, some people still eat shark's fin . It is brutal of them to do that. We can't destroy the ecosystem, or it must influence the balance of ecospecies. Although we haven't seen the serious condition, many species will probably become extinct some day. No one can stop the huge impact of animal crisis if we are reckless of protecting animals. We can't let the species die out and it's time to raise the animal rights.